On 29 October, Foreign Ministry Spokesman Liu
Jianchao held the regular press
conference.
Q: The French side called
for the UN Security Council meeting on UN weapons inspection
in Iraq. The US and Britain officials have been
non-committal. Is that something China would be interested
in?
A: China's position on the Iraqi
Issue is clear-cut. We maintain that the UN weapons
inspectors should be readmitted to Iraq to carry our their
work at an early date, which is an indispensable step for
the solution of this issue. We maintain that it should be up
to the UN Security Council to decide the next step according
to the outcome of the inspection.
Q:
France and Russia has made clear their opposition to the UN
Security Council draft resolution raised by the United
States on the Iraqi issue. What is China's position on the
draft resolution? Do you believe that this draft resolution
will bring political resolution to the Iraq crisis or this
is not something new for you to
consider?
A: China's position on the
UN Security Council resolution is that we will take into
earnest consideration any draft resolution conducive to the
UN weapons inspections on Iraq, conducive to the
verification and destruction of the weapons of massive
destruction in Iraq, and conducive to the political solution
of the Iraqi issue.
Q: The sixteenth
National Congress of the CCP will soon be held. What will be
the main topics for discussion? Besides, what is your
comment on the outcome of the election in Brazil? And what
impact it may have on China-Brazil
relations?
A: As the foreign ministry
spokesperson, I am not authorized to answer your first
question.
Regarding the presidential election
in Brazil, we would like to congratulate Luiz Inacio Lula da
Silva on his victory. President Jiang Zemin has already sent
him a telegram of congratulation. Brazil is a big developing
country, and the Chinese government values its friendly
relations and cooperation with Brazil. The strategic
partnership between the two sides has made substantive
progress and will make further headway with the join efforts
of the governments of the two countries.
Q: President Jiang Zemin has made a
very successful visit to the United States promoting greater
development of the China-US relations. What impact will this
visit have towards the peace and development of South
Asia?
A: President Jiang Zemin has
just paid a constructive and fruitful visit to the United
States during which he had good talks with President Bush,
and had an in-depth exchange of views on China-US relations
and major international and regional issues of common
interest. Consensus has been reached in not only enhancing
cooperation in economy, trade, culture and education etc.,
but also in maintaining and enhancing high-level strategic
exchanges and dialogues between the two
countries.
Both sides expressed satisfaction
with their counter-terrorism cooperation in the past year
and agreed to strengthen such cooperation on the basis of
reciprocity and mutual benefit, and to jointly oppose
terrorism in all forms. And the third round of
counter-terrorism talks will be held within this year. The
two sides also agreed to restore the military-to-military
exchanges and to conduct cooperation including the defense
consultations at the vice-ministerial level in the near
future. In the mean time, the two sides also agreed to
establish a consultation mechanism at the vice foreign
ministerial level on issues of strategic security,
multilateral arms control and
non-proliferation.
The two leaders discussed
and had a candid exchange of views on the Taiwan issue.
President Jiang elaborated on China’s basic position
of ‘peaceful reunification, and one country, two
systems” for the settlement of the Taiwan issue and
emphasized that the separatist activities of the
“Taiwan independence” forces constitute the
biggest threat to the stability across the Taiwan Straits
and to the development of the China-US relations. President
Jiang urged the US side to stick to the one-China policy and
the three China-US joint communiqués, and to play a
constructive role in the peaceful reunification of China.
President Bush said that the US side understands the
sensitivity of the Taiwan issue, adheres to the one-China
policy and is against the independence of Taiwan. The US
side appreciates China’s stand on the peaceful
resolution of the Taiwan issue, and the above policy of the
US government will remain unchanged.
The two
sides also exchanged views on other issues. As for whether
the two sides had touched upon conflicts between India and
Pakistan, I don’t have more information in this
regard,while China’s stand on this issue is
clear to all.
Q: It is reported that
China’s Special Envoy on the Middle East will visit
the Middle East region from November 6 to 16 and meet with
Secretary-general Moussa of the League of Arab States. Could
you confirm that?
A: China’s
Special Envoy Ambassador Wang Shijie will visit the Middle
East from the beginning of November, during which he will
have an in-depth exchange of views on the Middle East issue
with the parties concerned including Israel and Palestine.
As for the specific agenda, I will try to get more
information from the relevant departments and will inform
you of the latest development in due
course.
Q: Just now when you mentioned
President Jiang’s visit to the United States, you
quoted the Xinhua report that the two heads of state had
discussed the Taiwan issue during their meeting. However,
according to the report we have read, the original statement
made by President Bush is “does not support Taiwan
independence” instead of “is against the
independence of Taiwan” as you mentioned. Is there any
difference between them? Besides, have the two leaders
mentioned the arms sales to Taiwan during their
meeting?
A: I believe that what you
read is from the media report on the remarks made by
President Jiang and President Bush in the press briefing
after their meeting. I have just briefed about the exchange
of views between the Chinese and the US leaders during the
meeting and made clear our position. The Chinese side also
told the US side in explicit terms that the Taiwan
issue is the most sensitive issue at the core of China-US
relations and should be treated with prudence. We attach
importance to the US leader’s stand on the Taiwan
issue and urge the US side to honor its commitment and to
play a constructive role in safeguarding peace and stability
across the Taiwan Straits and in realizing the peaceful
reunification of China.
Q: It is
reported that President Jiang was half an hour’s late
on his way to the family ranch of President Bush. Do you
know the reason for it?
A: I have not
heard the relevant situation. My colleagues accompanying
President Jiang’s visit will return to Beijing this
evening and I may try to find it
out.
Q: The Leaders of China and other
economies of APEC have issued a joint statement on
counter-terrorism cooperation in Mexico. Does it indicate
the US-led campaign against terrorism will further expand to
the Muslim countries and other
organizations?
A: This year the APEC
informal leadership meeting has been concluded in Mexico.
The conference finally approved the leaders’
declaration and counter-terrorism declaration. The Chinese
side is satisfied with the result of the meeting, which has
scored progress in many aspects, including
counter-terrorism. All parties agreed to further
anti-terrorism cooperation in the economic field, and in the
customs, transportation, finance, network and so on, and to
create a sound environment for the regional economic
development on the basis of the APEC Shanghai meeting last
year.
I would like to add that first of all,
the counter-terrorism campaign is a global one, winning
support from most countries in the world. Second, I would
like to reiterate that the fight against terrorism should
have concrete evidence and should not be willfully expanded,
or be linked with any specific country, ethnic group and
religion. As for what you mentioned in your question, the
counter-terrorism targets should not be linked with the
Muslims.
Q: Today Japan and the DPRK
will have talks in Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia on the
normalization of diplomatic ties. What is the comment of the
Chinese side?
A: The Chinese side
expresses its pleasure and welcome to the normalization
talks between the two countries, which has been suspended
for tow years. The two countries are both China’s
close neighbors. We have all along supported Japan and the
DPRK in improving the bilateral ties and eventually
normalizing their diplomatic
relations.
Q: Just now you have
mentioned that President Bush’s statement on the
Taiwan issue in his meeting with President Jiang is
different with the statement from the White House. Could you
make clear about that? What is the English wording of
President Bush?
A: I have just
explicitly briefed on the exchange of views between the two
sides on the Taiwan issue and the respective position. As
for the exact English wording, I can not confirm right now
because I am not at the site or in contact with my colleague
there. However, from my knowledge, President Bush said that
the US side understands the sensitivity of the Taiwan issue,
adheres to the one China policy, and is against the
independence of Taiwan. The US side appreciates
China’s stand on the peaceful resolution of the Taiwan
issue. In the mean time, and he stresses that the above
policy will remain unchanged.
Q: The
Xinhua report also mentioned that President Jiang invited
President Bush to pay another visit to China, which was not
included in the press release of the White House. Could you
confirm that?
A: We believe that the
press release is issued respectively by the press officers
of the two countries. What China introduces to the outside
is the true reflection of the meetings. I can also confirm
that President Jiang invited President Bush to pay another
visit to China in their meetings and President Bush accepted
it with pleasure. I can also tell you that Vice President
Cheney will pay a formal visit to China early next year at
the invitation of Chinese Vice-President Hu Jintao. This
also marks the continuation of high-level exchanges between
the two countries and is of crucial significance for
maintaining the high-level strategic dialogue between the
two countries.
|